Why the study?
This study aimed to characterize sex-specific differences in clinical presentation, progression through the AF care pathway from diagnosis to catheter ablation, and long-term outcomes.
Does female sex affect progression through the atrial fibrillation care pathway to catheter ablation and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with incident atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=165,563)
Does female sex affect progression through the atrial fibrillation care pathway to catheter ablation and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with incident atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a large real-world cohort of 165,563 patients with incident AF, women experienced significant drop-offs across every step of the specialty care pathway—including a 16% lower likelihood of catheter ablation—and had higher risks of incident stroke and dementia compared with men.
AIMS: To characterize sex-specific differences in clinical presentation, evaluate progression through the atrial fibrillation (AF) care pathway from diagnosis to catheter ablation (CA) and assess long-term outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with incident AF at Northwell Health between 2015 and 2024 from the ITHACA-database. Sex-specific differences in clinical presentation were examined. The AF care pathway was operationalized as a stepwise cascade, modelling conditional drop-off to identify care gaps. Sex-specific CA risk ratios were assessed via Poisson regression. Incident AF was identified among 165 563/655 459 patients (71.4 ± 11.6 years, 32% non-white, 45% female) with a recorded diagnosis of AF. Women were older (73.3 ± 10.6 vs. 69.8 ± 12.1 years, P < 0.001), had higher rates of dementia (9.1% vs. 5.2%), stroke (8.6% vs. 7.4%) and congestive heart failure (21.5% vs. 20.8%) at diagnosis. Transfer-of-care gaps [median 3.6 years follow-up, 96% retention] were identified at every level: 31.5% of women vs. 35.3% of men were evaluated by cardiology, 16.2% vs. 21.6% by electrophysiology, and 3.5% vs. 5.7% underwent CA (all P < 0.001). Women were 16% less likely to receive CA (RR 0.84 95% CI 0.77-0.91). In cause-specific Cox models, female sex was associated with incident stroke (aHR 1.24, 95% CI 1.18-1.30) and dementia (aHR 1.30, 95% CI 1.24-1.35), but modestly lower mortality after adjustment (aHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99). CONCLUSION: In this real-world analysis, significant sex-specific differences in clinical phenotype at presentation, progression through the AF care pathway and clinical outcomes were observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coleman et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Incident atrial fibrillation (n=165,563). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Receipt of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.91, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: