Why the study?
Men and women with heart failure exhibit distinct clinical phenotypes, pathophysiological substrates, and therapeutic responses, which have direct implications for diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic management alongside unresolved gaps in clinical research.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This critical review highlights profound sex-based differences in heart failure pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and pharmacokinetics, advocating for a shift toward sex-aware precision medicine in diagnosis and therapy titration.
Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide, with an estimated prevalence projected to exceed 8.5 million cases in the United States by 2030. Despite similar lifetime risk between sexes, men and women exhibit profoundly distinct clinical phenotypes, pathophysiological substrates, and therapeutic responses. Women more frequently develop HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), predominantly of non-ischemic etiology, while men more often present with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) of ischemic origin. These differences have direct implications for diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic management. This critical review analyzes the main available evidence on sex and gender differences in HF, with particular attention to pathophysiological bases, disparities in the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway, and unresolved gaps in clinical research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alessandra Pratesi (2026) conducted a review in Heart Failure. Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: