Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Integrated energy systems (IES) face increasing challenges in achieving low-carbon and economically efficient operation because of the strong inter-temporal coupling of long-duration energy storage and the limited coordination of carbon and oxygen utilization. However, the coordinated integration of long-duration liquid CO₂ energy storage (LCES) scheduling with carbon–oxygen recycling has received limited attention. To address this gap, this study develops a bi-level low-carbon economic dispatch framework. First, a coupled LCES–OCC–power-to-gas (P2G)–methanol synthesis system is established, in which the oxygen generated by P2G is supplied to oxygen-enriched combustion capture (OCC) and captured CO₂ is coordinated between LCES and methanol synthesis, forming a closed carbon–oxygen utilization loop. Second, a PPO-based bi-level scheduling architecture is developed for long-horizon LCES operation, with proximal policy optimization (PPO) determining the charge/discharge strategy and a lower-level mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model performing constraint-based IES dispatch. Case studies show that the fully integrated configuration reduces total operating cost by 22.47% and actual carbon emissions by 15.94% compared with a battery-only configuration, while eliminating wind and solar curtailment. Compared with the configuration without LCES, the total operating cost is further reduced by 4.12%. Under the same integrated system, PPO reduces operating cost by 7.7% relative to the no-RL MILP strategy and by 1.29% relative to deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG), while reducing actual carbon emissions by 4.32% compared with DDPG. Monte Carlo analysis achieves 97.7% feasibility with a 3.3% coefficient of variation in actual carbon emissions. These results demonstrate the potential of coordinated LCES and carbon–oxygen utilization for simultaneously improving the economic, renewable-accommodation, and low-carbon performance of IES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: