Key result
Suboptimal post-PCI FFR below 0.90 linked to ~2.7-fold higher MACE risk in diffuse lesions.
Why the study?
The prognostic factors influencing clinical outcomes after FFR-guided PCI in patients with diffuse long coronary lesions and the prognostic value of post-PCI FFR needed to be determined.
Does achieving an optimal post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR ≥0.90) reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with diffuse long coronary lesions (≥20 mm) undergoing FFR-guided PCI?
Observational (n=327)
Blinded outcome adjudication
No
Does achieving an optimal post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR ≥0.90) reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with diffuse long coronary lesions (≥20 mm) undergoing FFR-guided PCI?
In patients undergoing FFR-guided PCI for diffuse long coronary lesions (≥20 mm), post-PCI FFR <0.90 is the strongest independent predictor of 2-year MACE, supporting a procedural target of post-PCI FFR ≥0.90 for physiological optimization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suboptimal post-PCI FFR was associated with higher MACE risk; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice pending prospective trials.
Objectives: To identify prognostic factors influencing clinical outcomes after fractional flow reserve (FFR)guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diffuse long coronary lesions, and to determine the prognostic value of post-PCI FFR.Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 327 patients with diffuse coronary lesions (≥20 mm) who underwent FFR-guided PCI between January 2018 and December 2022.FFR was measured using a 0.014-inch pressure wire during maximal adenosine-induced hyperemia, calculated as the ratio of mean distal coronary pressure to mean aortic pressure.Post-PCI FFR was recorded with the sensor positioned ≥10 mm distal to the stented segment.The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), comprising target lesion revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, and cardiac death.Independent predictors were identified using multivariate Cox regression.Results: During a median follow-up of 24 months, 57 patients (17.4%) experienced MACE.Five independent predictors were identified: suboptimal post-PCI FFR <0.90 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-4.02;P<0.001), lesion length ≥30 mm (HR, 1.95; P=0.002), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.84; P=0.003), severe calcification requiring plaque modification (HR, 1.78; P=0.004), and baseline FFR ≤0.60 (HR, 1.64; P=0.012).Achieving optimal post-PCI FFR (≥0.90) reduced MACE risk by 63%.Conclusions: Post-PCI FFR is the strongest predictor of long-term outcomes after FFR-guided PCI for diffuse long lesions.Achieving post-PCI FFR ≥0.90 should be a procedural target, which supports a physiology-guided optimization strategy to improve prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lai et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Diffuse long coronary lesions undergoing FFR-guided PCI (n=327). Suboptimal post-PCI FFR (<0.90) vs. Optimal post-PCI FFR (≥0.90) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of target lesion revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, and cardiac death) (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.78-4.02, p=<0.001). Suboptimal post-PCI FFR (<0.90) independently increased the risk of MACE (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.78-4.02; P<0.001) after FFR-guided PCI for diffuse long coronary lesions.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: