Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study examined the extent that green tourism practices are adopted by tourism amenities along South Africa’s Mpumalanga Panorama Route, a rural scenic destination facing increasing sustainability pressures. The study design combined structured surveys and semi-structured interviews with tourism operators, supported by secondary policy and industry data. The Sustainability Competency and Opportunity Rating & Evaluation (S-CORE) framework was applied to measure performance across environmental and socio-economic indicators. Findings revealed uneven adoption of sustainability practices. Socio-economic contributions, including local employment, gender equity, and support for community enterprises, scored highly and were widely implemented. In contrast, environmental practices remain underdeveloped: energy efficiency relies largely on non-renewable electricity, waste management shows only moderate progress, and advanced water conservation measures such as greywater recycling were rare. Results highlighted a significant gap between sustainability policy commitments and practical implementation. Without stronger adoption of environmental practices, Mpumalanga’s tourism sector risks undermining provincial and national commitments to low-carbon development and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. This study provides the first empirical assessment of green practice adoption in a South African tourism destination route. This paper provides original evidence about sustainability transitions and offers policy-relevant recommendations for incentives, enforcement, and capacity-building to accelerate the adoption of green tourism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MANUGA et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: