Key result
Emergency pericardiocentesis resolves post-PCI cardiac tamponade caused by guidewire perforation, evacuating ~850 mL of blood.
Why the study?
Coronary artery perforation during PCI occurs in approximately 0.37% of procedures and poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges when complicated by cardiac tamponade.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Distal coronary artery perforations caused by hydrophilic guidewires during PCI can initially mimic intramural hematomas and cause delayed life-threatening cardiac tamponade requiring emergency pericardiocentesis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vigilance for delayed tamponade is warranted after distal PCI guidewire perforation; leaves open optimal prevention strategies.
Introduction: The incidence of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is approximately 0.37%. The most common causes include interventions on chronic total occlusions (CTO), lesions with pronounced and excessive calcification, as well as the increasingly frequent use of atherectomy, rotational atherectomy (rotablation), and high-pressure balloons. Rare cases of spontaneous perforations have also been described. The aim of this paper is to present a patient with coronary artery perforation during a standard PCI procedure, with particular emphasis on the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the event of cardiac tamponade. Case Presentation: Patient M.S., aged 65, was hospitalized for elective coronary angiography. Angiography revealed no significant lesions in the left main coronary artery, LAD, or circumflex artery. The distal segment of the RCA was diffusely atherosclerotic and suboccluded. PCI of the distal RCA segment was performed. After advancing the Whisper LS coronary guidewire, contrast retention was observed in the projection of a small side branch, initially interpreted as an intramural hematoma. The patient remained hemodynamically stable, and the procedure was continued with stent implantation. After completion of the procedure, the contrast shadow increased. One hour later, the patient's condition deteriorated, presenting with chest pain, tachycardia (~100/min), hypotension (80/60 mmHg), and an episode of syncope. Echocardiography confirmed pericardial effusion with signs of impending tamponade. Emergency pericardiocentesis was performed, evacuating 850 mL of blood. Conclusion: PCI procedures are becoming increasingly complex, which raises the risk of rare but serious complications such as coronary artery perforation. A particular challenge is their timely recognition, especially in distal lesions. Despite technological advances, mortality remains significant, underscoring the importance of rapid diagnosis and an appropriate therapeutic approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitov et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Coronary artery perforation and impending cardiac tamponade during percutaneous coronary intervention of the distal right coronary artery (n=1). Emergency pericardiocentesis following PCI of the distal RCA with Whisper LS guidewire and stent implantation (two CRE8 2.5 x 20 mm stents and one Xience Pro 2.75 x 18 mm stent) was evaluated on Resolution of impending cardiac tamponade via emergency pericardiocentesis. Emergency pericardiocentesis evacuated 850 mL of blood to treat impending cardiac tamponade 1 hour after distal RCA PCI complicated by guidewire perforation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: