Why the study?
Hypotension in older adults is usually classified into distinct syndromes that differ in mechanism, yet they frequently coexist and are poorly explained by resting blood pressure.
Population
Older adults with hypotension
Design
Review and physiological framework proposal
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Requires integrated multidomain haemodynamic assessment in older adults with hypotension; leaves open targeted intervention trials.
Background: Hypotension in older adults is usually classified into distinct syndromes (orthostatic, postprandial, neurogenic, medication-related and illness-associated) that differ in mechanism, yet frequently coexist and are poorly explained by resting blood pressure. Content: We review how structural and functional cardiovascular ageing progressively erodes integrated haemodynamic reserve across six domains: cardiac, arterial, venous (preload), autonomic, renal/neurohumoral and regional autoregulatory. On this basis, we propose haemodynamic vulnerability as a physiological framework: a latent state of reduced integrated haemodynamic reserve that could, in future studies, be identified by abnormal responses to standardized challenges falling short of the diagnostic criteria for hypotension. We distinguish it from normal cardiovascular ageing and from related concepts (physiological reserve, frailty, resilience and haemodynamic frailty), propose an operational definition with testable predictions, outline candidate indices of reserve and resilience, and consider the potential contribution of artificial intelligence. Clinical implications: The framework shifts attention from resting blood pressure to haemodynamic competence, the ability to maintain blood pressure and organ perfusion under stress, and helps explain the overlap between hypotensive phenotypes. Conclusions: Haemodynamic vulnerability links cardiovascular ageing to the different hypotensive phenotypes. Prospective validation is required before it can support risk stratification and clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stoicescu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: