Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study develops a Cost-Informed SDG Transformation Priority Index (CI-STPI) using the selected-target dashboard of the Global Sustainable Development Report 2023 (GSDR 2023). The index operationalises relative ex ante transformation burden through three directly observable dimensions: distance from target, trend of SDG progress in 2023, and directional change between 2020 and 2023. The coded dimensions are rescaled to their theoretical maxima and aggregated into an entry-level score with a theoretical range of 30.00 to 100.00, where higher values indicate greater relative transformation burden. The baseline model uses only observed dashboard information, while the report’s transformation phases are retained as a supplementary interpretive and robustness layer. Robustness is assessed through one-at-a-time weight perturbations, equal weighting, geometric aggregation, a strict non-compensatory stress test, comparison with the supplementary TPI model, and a missing-information treatment for N/A directional-change entries. Sustainable fish-stock management, greenhouse-gas mitigation, food security, institutional resilience, and selected health outcomes remain the highest-priority areas within the dashboard’s 36-entry universe. Moderate weight perturbations and geometric aggregation preserve the upper-priority cluster, whereas equal weighting and the strict minimum rule affect several middle-ranking positions and priority-band classifications. The study contributes a transparent and reproducible procedure for converting an authoritative SDG dashboard into a pre-budget prioritisation tool for sequencing, policy appraisal, and resource-allocation deliberation. The CI-STPI should be interpreted as a relative transformation-burden proxy, not as a measure of monetary cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jasim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: