Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Organizations facing uncertainty must interpret incomplete information, coordinate responses and protect performance while preserving their capacity to adapt. This conceptual paper develops a framework explaining how leadership agility may contribute to organizational resilience and performance. A focused, non-systematic synthesis integrates selected leadership, resilience and dynamic capabilities literature, comparing concepts, findings and contextual limitations. The framework proposes that leaders’ sensing, revisable decisions, coordination and learning may become shared organizational routines supporting anticipation, coping and adaptation. Organizational resilience may connect leadership agility with performance, while a direct leadership–performance pathway remains possible. Six propositions address these relationships, differences across performance outcomes and time horizons, and the roles of environmental uncertainty and resource availability. The paper contributes a leader-to-collective explanation of resilience and distinguishes continuity during disruption from recovery and longer-term renewal. Practical implications concern decision authority, information sharing, routine development and balanced performance assessment. The study collects no primary data and does not test causal effects; its propositions require longitudinal and multilevel investigation. Purposive source selection and incomplete full-text access limit the synthesis, which should be interpreted as a theory-building argument rather than an exhaustive review or an empirically validated model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dr Rambo Johns Paul Isaac Lorube, Dr Nitin Deshpande Lorube, Deshpande (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: