Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution against galectin-3 for aortic monitoring in pediatric BAV; leaves open identification of alternative biomarkers.
This study aimed to compare serum galectin-3 levels between children with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and healthy controls and to investigate the association between galectin-3 levels and aortic dimensions in children with BAV. This prospective, single-center, cross-sectional, controlled study included 47 children with echocardiographically confirmed BAV and 43 healthy controls. Echocardiographic aortic dimensions and corresponding Z-scores, anthropometric measurements, and serum galectin-3 levels were assessed. Aortic dilation was defined as an ascending aorta Z-score > 2. Age, body mass index, and cardiac function were similar between groups, whereas sex distribution differed significantly. Ascending aorta diameter and Z-score were significantly greater in the BAV group than in controls (27.94 ± 5.56 vs. 21.52 ± 2.53 mm, p < 0.001; 2.34 ± 1.54 vs. 0.31 ± 0.72, p < 0.001). Aortic dilation was present in 28 (59.6%) BAV patients. Serum galectin-3 levels did not differ between BAV patients and controls [8.70 (7.03–11.38) vs. 8.05 (6.10–13.15) ng/mL, p = 0.566]. No significant correlation was found between galectin-3 levels and aortic dimensions or Z-scores. Galectin-3 levels were also similar in BAV patients with and without aortic dilation [8.80 (6.58–12.30) vs. 8.15 (6.30–10.95) ng/mL, p = 0.537]. Serum galectin-3 levels were not associated with aortic dimensions or aortic dilation in children with BAV. Longitudinal studies incorporating serial assessment of aortic dimensions and complementary markers of aortic disease are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sönmez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: