Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Whether a sick or small infant is passing enough urine is one of the most useful things a caregiver can know at home, and one of the hardest to judge by eye from a cloth nappy, which absorbs urine invisibly. Weighing the nappy on a kitchen scale converts the question into arithmetic — wet mass minus dry mass is urine mass — but the arithmetic carries errors: cloth nappies differ in dry mass from one another, water evaporates from a wet nappy before it is weighed, and a kitchen scale resolves only so finely. This paper models all three. With stated assumptions — dry nappy mass with a standard deviation of 8 g across nappies, urine of 5 mL/kg per void and seven voids per day, evaporation modelled from temperature and humidity, and a 1 g kitchen scale — a naive method that subtracts the average dry mass and weighs at four-hour intervals without correction has a daily bias of −11.2 g and a daily standard deviation of 21.3 g, and in a hot, dry climate at six-hour intervals its bias reaches −67.2 g per day. The paper originates a protocol — weigh each nappy dry before use (paired tare), change and weigh at most every two hours, seal a nappy in a closed bag if weighing must wait, and apply a printed evaporation correction table by interval and climate band — under which the daily standard deviation falls to 4.0 g with a bias of 0.0 g. The smallest change in daily urine output the protocol can reliably detect for a reference 5 kg infant, whose modelled daily output is 175 mL, is 11.2 g, or 6.4% of the daily total, against 59.1 g (33.8%) for the naive method. The paper prints where the method breaks: a single stool of a stated 10 g counted as urine inflates the day by 5.7% of a 5 kg infant's output, and sweat absorbed into the nappy in hot weather is indistinguishable from urine by mass.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: