Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Six retention media (DRAM, NAND flash, magnetic disk and tape, phase-change memory, FeRAM, and MRAM) are compared on a single physical budget: retention mechanism, physical failure channel, characteristic energy barrier from the literature, retention time at 300 K computed by anchored Arrhenius scaling, and holding energy per bit-year computed from published device figures. DRAM is the only medium with second-scale retention and a large continuous holding cost (1.38e-4 J per bit-year); every nonvolatile medium retains unpowered at zero holding energy, with computed 300 K retention from 1.52 years (end-of-life NAND flash) to 9.88e7 years (phase-change memory). Magnetic tape on a shelf is cheapest per bit-year at scale; phase-change memory is most stable per joule. Model calculations are simulated, not measured. Computations and drafting were performed with Dave, an AI research system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: