Key result
Adding WBC, PLT, and D-dimer to NT-proBNP fails to improve severe heart failure discrimination.
Why the study?
The value of combined detection of NT-ProBNP, WBC, PLT, and D-Dimer in evaluating the severity of patients with heart failure needed to be explored.
Does the combined detection of NT-ProBNP, WBC, PLT, and D-Dimer improve the discrimination of heart failure severity (NYHA class III-IV) compared to NT-ProBNP alone in hospitalized patients with heart failure?
Observational (n=198)
No
Does the combined detection of NT-ProBNP, WBC, PLT, and D-Dimer improve the discrimination of heart failure severity (NYHA class III-IV) compared to NT-ProBNP alone in hospitalized patients with heart failure?
Adding routine hematologic and coagulation markers (WBC, PLT, D-Dimer) to NT-ProBNP does not improve diagnostic discrimination for heart failure severity (NYHA class III-IV vs. I-II) compared to NT-ProBNP alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NT-proBNP alone offers modest discrimination for severe HF without added value from inflammatory markers; leaves open whether multi-marker panels warrant prospective validation.
Objective: To explore the value of combined detection of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP), white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count (PLT) and D-dimer (D-Dimer) in evaluating the severity of patients with heart failure. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted. A total of 198 patients diagnosed with heart failure who received treatment in Guangxi-ASEAN Economic and Technological Development Zone People’s Hospital (Nanning Tenth People’s Hospital) from January 2024 to June 2025 were enrolled. According to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac functional classification, patients were divided into NYHA class I-II group (59 cases) and NYHA class III-IV group (139 cases). The differences in levels of NT-ProBNP, WBC, PLT, D-Dimer and other indicators between the two groups were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to identify influencing factors for increased severity of heart failure. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to analyze the predictive value of single-indicator detection and combined-indicator detection for heart failure severity. Results: The NT-ProBNP level in patients of NYHA class III-IV group was significantly higher than that in NYHA class I-II group, with statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that elevated NT-ProBNP level was independently associated with NYHA class III-IV (OR = 1.000, 95% CI: 1.000 - 1.000, P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under curve (AUC) of NT-ProBNP for predicting heart failure severity was 0.663, with a sensitivity of 54.33% and specificity of 73.47%. The AUC of combined detection was 0.663, with sensitivity of 56.36% and specificity of 74.36%. Conclusion: Elevated NT-ProBNP level is independently associated with NYHA class III-IV in patients with heart failure. The addition of WBC, PLT and D-Dimer to NT-ProBNP did not demonstrate improved discrimination over NT-ProBNP alone, as both approaches achieved an identical AUC of 0.663. Small differences in sensitivity and specificity at separately selected thresholds do not establish superiority or justify routine clinical adoption of the combined panel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=198). Elevated NT-ProBNP (alone or combined with WBC, PLT, and D-Dimer) vs. NYHA class I-II vs NYHA class III-IV (or NT-ProBNP alone) was evaluated on Association with and prediction of NYHA class III-IV heart failure severity (OR 1.000, 95% CI 1.000 - 1.000, p=0.035). Elevated NT-ProBNP was independently associated with functional class III-IV heart failure, while adding WBC, PLT, and D-Dimer did not improve discrimination.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: