Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This cross-sectional study examines associations between the frequency of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) use, cognitive autonomy, and academic engagement among students at Félix Houphouët-Boigny University in Cocody, Côte d’Ivoire. Self-determination theory provides an interpretive framework. In May 2026, a structured questionnaire was administered to 400 convenience-sampled students from the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences who had previously used GAI for academic purposes. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s chi-square tests, and Cramér’s V were computed using SPSS. Among these GAI users, 81.3% reported frequent use. Use frequency was associated with cognitive autonomy (χ²(4) = 19.847; p = .001; V = .158) and academic engagement (χ²(4) = 30.622; p < .001; V = .196). The association between cognitive autonomy and academic engagement was stronger (χ²(4) = 87.792; p < .001; V = .331). These cross-sectional associations do not establish causal effects. The findings support the need for critical pedagogical guidance and further investigation of how students use GAI in practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kouame et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: