Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Urban planning education increasingly requires students to connect data-intensive analysis with context-sensitive design and defensible decisions. This paper documents a hybrid Problem-Based Learning (PBL)–Studio-Based Learning (SBL) model implemented in the Eco-Sensitive Regional Planning Studio of the BSc (Hons) Urban Informatics and Planning program at the University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. A single-cohort reflective case study examines how 31 third-year students, working in three groups with support from six academic mentors, addressed Human–Elephant Conflict (HEC) as a complex socio-ecological and spatial planning problem. The studio combined student-led problem framing, individual inquiry, expert engagement, two field immersions, LUCIS-based spatial diagnostics, structured debate, scenario construction, iterative critique, exhibition-style assessment, and professional communication. The revised framework organizes these activities through a Data → Design → Decision logic linking learning activities, evidence, student outputs, and assessment. Evidence reported here is based on module documentation, observable student artifacts and processes, and teaching-team reflection; no causal pre/post comparison is claimed. The case demonstrates how PBL inquiry and SBL iteration can be combined to make the transition from spatial evidence to alternative scenarios and decision-oriented outputs explicit, while identifying implementation conditions including scaffolded autonomy, distributed mentoring, selective blended delivery, and transparent ethics and data-governance procedures. The study offers a reproducible pedagogical design proposition for sustainability-oriented Urban Informatics and Planning education that requires further testing across cohorts and institutional settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jayasinghe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: