Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper substantiates scaling the combined physical-intelligent protection method, previously developed for stationary microprocessor interlocking cabinets, to onboard locomotive systems operating under fully autonomous (GoA3/GoA4) control. Vulnerability of critical locomotive subsystems to destructive electromagnetic influences is analyzed across three physical paths: the galvanic track circuit of ALSN receiver coils and Eurobalise readers, the airborne radio-channel path of FRMCS/5G-Rail and satellite navigation antennas, and internal locomotive CAN-bus/MVB/Ethernet data buses exposed to ultra-wideband transient pulses. A hybrid onboard module architecture is proposed, combining a passive multilayer shielded enclosure with vibration damping and an active Edge AI computational core acting as a transparent gateway between antenna inputs and the onboard safety computer. A dedicated mathematical apparatus and AI logic are developed for onboard operation under motion dynamics: dataset engineering accounting for the Doppler frequency shift and pantograph arcing transients; an adaptive Short-Time Fourier Transform with a Gaussian window depending on locomotive speed; INT8 quantization of a lightweight depthwise-separable convolutional network for fixed-point inference; and a speed-dependent Softmax threshold that tightens automatically at higher speeds to minimize reaction delay. A Hardware-in-the-Loop test stand combining an anechoic chamber, UWB/HPM generators, and a vibration bench determined reversible bit-flip and irreversible burnout thresholds, confirming the effectiveness of nanosecond active protective switches triggered by Edge AI, and a two-tier architecture integrating onboard modules with centralized railway cyber-monitoring for EW threat mapping is outlined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Сотник et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: