Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates the interface between (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se 2 (ACIGS) and In 2 O 3 :Sn (ITO) in bifacial solar cells with X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM) and Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (STEM-EDS). The aim is to characterize the GaO x layer forming at the rear interface in solar cell samples with varying NaF precursor layer, maximum deposition temperature, deposition time, and Ga-concentration. The GaO x layer is present in all samples, even when no NaF is added. Temperature and excess NaF appear to increase the thickness or roughness of the GaO x layer, yet a continuous layer of < 3 nm is found at the ACIGS/ITO interface in all samples. Good performance could be reached, with FF∽72-76% even with a GaO x layer present. Considering the limited thickness of the GaO x layer measured in this study, it does not block the current flow and could have a degree of passivation on the rear interface of the solar cells, leading to the high FF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bengtson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: