Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research investigates how academic workload and working-hour flexibility relate to the work productivity of employed students at Pamulang University. A quantitative associative method was applied, involving 35 respondents selected through purposive sampling. Primary data were obtained through questionnaires using a five-point Likert scale and processed through multiple linear regression analysis, classical assumption testing, partial and simultaneous hypothesis testing, and the coefficient of determination. The findings reveal that academic workload has a negative relationship with work productivity, although the effect is statistically insignificant, as indicated by a significance level of 0.446. Meanwhile, working-hour flexibility demonstrates a positive relationship but does not have a significant effect, with a significance value of 0.097. The simultaneous test also indicates an insignificant effect of both independent variables, with a significance value of 0.236. Furthermore, the R² value of 0.086 indicates that the research variables account for 8.6% of the variation in work productivity, while the remaining proportion is associated with other factors beyond the research model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maulana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: