Research demonstrates improved compressive strength in geopolymer concrete using alternative sodium silicate sources, suggesting industrial by-products may enhance concrete performance.
The extraction of in-house sodium silicate (IHS) as an alternative to commercial silicate in geopolymer pervious concrete (GPC) is the focus of this research. The IHS was developed from rice husk ash (RHA) and treated palm oil fuel ash (TPOFA) using the hydrothermal method. Class F Fly Ash (FA) and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) were used as precursors in a 70:30 ratio. Steel slag aggregate (SSA) was used to wholly replace the conventional aggregates. Palm kernel shell biochar (PKS-BC) at various weight percentages between 1 and 5% was used to replace coarse aggregates (CA). GPC specimens were prepared using 10 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and one of the SS: commercial SS, RHA-based IHS, and a ‘Hybrid SS’ (commercial SS: TPOFA-based IHS – 50:50). The findings revealed that due to the toughness, surface roughness, and shape of the SSA, the compressive strength of SSA-based GPC specimens produced higher strength compared to crushed granite aggregate (CGA)-based GPC. ‘Hybrid SS’ and RHA-based IHS yielded slightly higher compressive strengths in GPC specimens compared to commercial SS-based GPC specimens. This finding proved that the appropriate ratio of silica source with NaOH facilitates the development of SS in the development of GPC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lazarus et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: