Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized controlled trial improved depression and stress in adults with MDD receiving standard treatments, suggesting adjunctive support is beneficial.
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is characterized by high stress sensitivity and unsatisfactory response rates to standard treatments. Stress and depression share a bidirectional relationship. We, therefore, conducted a pilot randomized control trial (RCT) to understand if adjunctive stress management and resiliency training tailored for depression(SMART-D), can improve treatment outcomes in patients with MDD, receiving treatment as usual(TAU) with standard treatments (medications and/or psychotherapy), in real-world clinical settings, compared to a group receiving TAU. Participants with MDD, in a current depressive episode, were randomized to adjunctive SMART-D (delivered by video telehealth over 8 weeks), compared to TAU alone. Random assignment, blinding of raters and statistician were utilized. The primary outcome measure was baseline to end point change in depression [Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D] over a 6-month follow-up period using a mixed model regression analysis. 27 participants (mean age 47.9 ± 14 years, female 67%) enrolled in the study (TAU = 14, SMART-D + TAU = 13). Baseline mood ratings were in mild-moderate symptom severity (HAM-D)- SMART-D + TAU = 12.2 ± 6.6, TAU = 13.9 ± 5.7). Linear mixed model analysis showed significant Group*Time interaction for measures of depression (HAM-D) (B = 6.1 (CI = 1.5-10.8, P = .01) and perceived stress (PSS) (B = 5.5(0.5-10.6), p = .03) between the 2 groups at 3 months post follow-up ((HAMD)-SMART-D + TAU = 8.7 ± 4.3 Vs. TAU = 16.1 ± 6.3), but not at 6-months (SMART-D + TAU = 8.1 ± 5.4 Vs. TAU = 12.3 ± 5.5). A RCT of 27 adults with MDD provide initial support that an adjunctive resiliency intervention (SMART-D) for patients with MDD may positively impact symptoms of depression and perceived stress, earlier than standard care. A small sample size limits ability to draw firm conclusions. Further investigation is warranted, using larger samples. Clinical Trials Registration I.D.# NCT04388748.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seshadri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: