Comparative analysis reveals gaps in quality control for dietary supplements, indicating a need for better regulation and cooperation.
The article is dedicated to the comparative analysis of regional strategies for ensuring economic security in the field of dietary supplements (DS) in the Russian Federation. The article examines existing mechanisms of quality and safety control for DS, including legal regulation, oversight by federal and regional authorities, as well as the role of scientific and public institutions in monitoring processes. The experience of the Republic of Tatarstan is analyzed, with a focus on issues such as insufficient laboratory facilities, limited legal status of DS, and difficulties in controlling online trade. The article discusses prospects for digitalization, creation of regional centers of competence, and voluntary certification of products. The conclusion emphasizes the need for improvement of the federal monitoring system for DS quality, strengthening interregional cooperation, and implementing new supervisory models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ho Duc Lai (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: