This paper highlights how learning disabilities affect self-concept, emotional regulation, and peer relationships, indicating a need for inclusive interventions.
This paper investigates the socio-emotional aspects of learning disabilities, emphasizing how they affect self-concept, emotional regulation, social skills, mental health, and peer relationships. Drawing on psychological theories, current educational practices, and empirical studies, the paper highlights the multifaceted nature of LD and advocates for a holistic, inclusive approach to intervention that recognizes and supports the emotional and social well-being of individuals with learning disabilities. As a result, the person may have trouble with tasks such as speaking, reading, writing, paying attention, understanding information, remembering things, performing mathematical calculations, or coordinating movements (Kohli. A, Sharma. S, 2018). A learning disability, isn’t related to intelligence. It just means that the person’s brain works differently from others. In many cases, there are treatments that can help a person with learning disabilities read, write, speak, and calculate just as well or better than someone without these disabilities. The socio-emotional aspects of learning disabilities (LD) focus on the emotional and social challenges that individuals with LD face due to their academic struggles. These challenges often include low self-esteem, anxiety, depression, social isolation, and difficulty with peer relationships. Students with LD may experience frustration and stress due to persistent academic difficulties and negative feedback from teachers and peers. Addressing these socio-emotional issues is crucial for supporting the overall well-being of students with LD. Interventions such as fostering an inclusive classroom environment, providing social skills training, teaching emotional regulation strategies, and promoting peer support can help enhance emotional resilience and improve social interactions, ultimately leading to better academic and personal outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaudhary et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: