Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis identified cardiac MRI factors for predicting outcomes in patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy, suggesting improved risk stratification.
Motivation: Nearly 30% of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) according to Class I recommendations do not benefit, highlighting the need for improved patient selection methods. Goal(s): This study aims to enhance risk stratification for CRT candidates with reduced ejection fraction and prolonged QRS by incorporating cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging factors beyond existing guidelines. Approach: We retrospectively analyzed 711 patients who underwent CMR imaging. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac-related events. Results: After a median follow-up of 4.8 years, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and left ventricular (LV) strains emerged as independent survival predictors, particularly influencing selection in Class IIa patients. Impact: These findings suggest that integrating CMR imaging into clinical practice can significantly improve candidate selection for CRT, potentially increasing treatment efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: