Retrospective analysis shows new-onset aortic regurgitation in patients after surgical repair, suggesting careful monitoring.
Background: Data on aortic valve outcomes following surgical repair of doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect remain limited. Methods: This retrospective study included doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect patients who underwent surgical repair at our centre from 2013 to 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of new-onset aortic regurgitation during follow-up. Results: A total of 320 patients were included, with a median age of 2.0 (0.9–7.2) years. Among them, 289 patients underwent surgical repair alone (repair group), and 31 received additional aortic valve surgery (repair + aortic valve surgery group). Preoperatively, 58 (18.1%) patients exhibited aortic regurgitation ≥ mild (10.7% in the repair group vs 87.1% in the repair + aortic valve surgery group, P < 0.001). The overall median follow-up was 40.5 (16.0–72.0) months. At the last follow-up, 23 (7.4%) patients had aortic regurgitation ≥ mild (3.8 vs 52.2%, P < 0.001), and 6 (1.9%) had aortic regurgitation > mild (0.3 vs 21.7%, P < 0.001). Sixteen (5.1%) patients developed new-onset aortic regurgitation during follow-up (1.7 vs 47.8%, log-rank P < 0.001), and 6 (1.9%) of them developed new-onset aortic regurgitation > mild (0.3 vs 21.7%, log-rank P < 0.001). Age, ventricular septal defect size, preoperative aortic regurgitation > mild, and maximum aortic valve flow velocity (AVmax) were related to concurrent aortic valve surgery and new-onset aortic regurgitation. Conclusions: Based on our retrospective data, the mid-term aortic valve outcomes after doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect repair were relatively satisfactory, with a low incidence of new-onset aortic regurgitation during follow-up. However, aortic valve outcomes for patients who received concurrent aortic valve surgery were less satisfactory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: