This investigation shows differences in vascular response to flow-mediated dilation in hypertensive and normotensive groups, suggesting novel biomarkers for endothelial dysfunction.
This study investigated differences in endothelial cell dysfunction (ECD) and vascular response between hypertensive (HT) and non-hypertensive (NHT) individuals, as evaluated by high-resolution flow-mediated dilation (hrFMD) using a 24-MHz ultrasound probe. The study included 31 participants in the HT group and 29 in the NHT group. Clinical data, laboratory findings, and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) were measured, as were brachial artery systolic and diastolic diameters at baseline and 30, 60, and 120 seconds after a 5-minute cuff occlusion. Based on these measurements, systolic (TERS) and diastolic (TERD) traditional expansion ratios (TER), as well as a new expansion ratio (NER), were calculated for each post-occlusion time point. Differences, correlations, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between ECD and hrFMD indices, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) reported. At 60 seconds, NER and TER values in the HT group were significantly lower than in the NHT group. Most participants in the NHT (22/29, 75.8%) and HT (21/31, 67.7%) groups exhibited peak vasodilation at NER₆₀. NER₆₀ was negatively correlated with age (r=-0.603, P<0.001), cIMT (r=-0.328, P=0.011), and systolic blood pressure (r=-0.277, P=0.032). NER₆₀ was associated with hypertension-related ECD independently of major cardiovascular risk factors (OR, 0.025; 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.316; P=0.004). In hrFMD, NER₆₀ was significantly lower in HT than in NHT participants and may represent a surrogate marker for impaired vascular reactivity associated with hypertension. However, its role in the direct detection of ECD requires further validation against established physiological criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: