Cohort study finds low total cholesterol is linked to higher mortality in older adults, particularly women, suggesting underlying health issues.
Background: The relationship between total cholesterol (TC) levels and mortality in older adults is complex and may differ from younger populations. While hypercholesterolemia is a known midlife risk factor, this association may weaken or reverse with age. Biological differences in cholesterol metabolism—particularly hormonal changes—may contribute to sex-specific mortality risks, but this remains underexplored. We examined the association between TC and all-cause mortality in older adults, assessing sex-specific differences. Methods: We used data from the InCHIANTI study, a longitudinal, population-based study conducted in Tuscany, Italy. From the original cohort (N = 1453), 999 participants ≥65 years with baseline TC and mortality data were included. TC levels were categorized as <200 mg/dL, 200–239 mg/dL, and ≥240 mg/dL. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality over 6-years. Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models assessed mortality risk across TC categories in the overall population and by sex. Restricted cubic splines explored non-linear associations. Models were adjusted for age, sex (only in overall population), BMI, physical activity, diabetes, COPD, hypertension, eGFR, polypharmacy and frailty. Results: A threshold effect was observed: mortality risk rose sharply below ~200 mg/dL and remained stable above. Compared to the <200 mg/dL group, intermediate and high TC levels were associated with lower mortality risk (HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.53–0.99 and HR 0.71; 95% CI: 0.49–1.02, respectively). In sex-stratified analyses, this pattern was pronounced in women but weaker and not statistically significant in men. Results held after excluding statin users and were confirmed by spline analysis. Conclusions: In older adults, particularly women, low TC may signal underlying vulnerability, including malnutrition or inflammation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iuorio et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: