Study finds technology overload affects subjective well-being in bank employees, highlighting work-family conflict as a mediator and perceived organizational support as a moderator.
Background/ problem: Amid digital transformation in Vietnam’s banking sector, technology overload has triggered role stress and work-family conflict, raising concerns about employee well-being. This study investigates the psychological and organizational mechanisms behind these effects. Objective/ purpose: This study examines how different forms of technology overload: information, communication, and system feature overload, affect the subjective well-being of Vietnamese bank employees, with work–family conflict (WFC) as a mediator and leader–member exchange (LMX) and perceived organizational support (POS) as moderators. Design and Methodology: Data was collected from 409 bank employees in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, via both online and offline surveys. Hypotheses were tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4 software. Results: The study found that WFC was significantly influenced by information overload (β = .23, p = .00), communication overload (β = .20, p = .00), and system feature overload (β = .29, p = .00), while WFC negatively impacted SWB (β = –.40, p = .00). Mediator effect of WFC on TO components with SWB was confirmed. Moderator effect of POS on WFC with SWB was significant (β = .11, p = .04), while LMX showed no significant moderator effect on TO components with WFC (p > .05). Conclusion and Implications: The findings highlight that employee behavior in the digital context is significantly influenced by role stress caused by technology overload, with POS playing a moderating role while LMX does not. Managers should optimize digital workload strategies, while employees need to proactively strengthen their digital adaptability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tran et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: