Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 29, 2024Russian judge

Payment Remuneration, Guarantees and Compensations as Labor Elements of Professional Activity of a Judge

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

YLYulia O. Lukhovskaya

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Legal analysis reveals unjustified salary disparities between top judicial officials, highlighting the necessity to standardize supplemental payments and compensation.

Key Points

  • Disparities between the salaries of supreme court leaders violate fundamental labor law principles, demonstrating an inequitable application of statutory labor remuneration.
  • Assessment of statutory judicial compensation identifies unjustified wage differences between the chief justices alongside a distinct lack of overtime work compensation.
  • Reforming current legislation may enable standardized supplemental payments for extra judicial duties and overtime, supporting equitable execution of the judges labor function.

Cite This Study

Yulia O. Lukhovskaya (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5a80fb6db64358754242dhttps://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3791-2024-9-24-29
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The main state guarantees for the remuneration of employees: analysis of legislation and court practice2024
  2. 2Disciplinary Liability as a Labor-Law Element of Professional Activities of Judges2024
  3. 3Commensurate remuneration for judges in times of budget cuts: An analysis of judicial independence and overtime compensation2026
  4. 4The Employer’s Figure as a Labor-Law Element of Professional Activities of a Judge2024
  5. 5Concept of ‘Regular Remuneration’ and ‘Employee Remuneration’ Resulting from Their Personal Wage Classification Based on an Hourly or Monthly Rate Within the Meaning of Article 151 <sup>1</sup> §§ 1 and 3 LC in the Light of the Supreme Court Case Law and Employment Law Doctrine2025