Cohort study identifies metformin and statins with clinical efficacy in reducing acute migraine attacks, suggesting new therapeutic options.
Introduction Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder with a substantial socioeconomic burden, underscoring the need for continued identification of therapeutic targets. Given the significant role of genetic factors in migraine pathogenesis, a genetic-based approach is considered effective for identifying potential therapeutic targets. This study aimed to identify candidate treatments for migraine by integrating genome-wide association study (GWAS) data, perturbagen profiles, and a large-scale claims database. Methods We used published GWAS data to impute disease-specific gene expression profiles using a transcriptome-wide association study approach. The imputed gene signatures were cross-referenced with perturbagen signatures from the LINCS Connectivity Map to identify candidate compounds capable of reversing the disease-associated gene expression. A real-world claims database was subsequently utilized to assess the clinical efficacy of the identified perturbagens on acute migraine, employing a cohort study design and mixed-effects log-linear models with the frequency of prescribed acute migraine medications as the outcome. Results Eighteen approved drugs were identified as candidate therapeutics based on the perturbagen profiles. Real-world analysis using the claims database demonstrated potential inhibitory effects of metformin (relative risk [RR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77–0.86), statins (RR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.92–0.96), thiazolidines (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73–0.97), and angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.61–0.77) on migraine attacks. Conclusion This multidisciplinary approach highlights a cost-effective framework for drug repositioning for migraine treatment by integrating genetic, pharmacological, and real-world clinical database.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inokuchi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: