This analysis presents a new solution to a puzzle about logical grounds in disjunctions, suggesting a broader understanding of their implications.
I begin by formulating a puzzle about grounds of disjunctions and fundamentality which puts pressure on some standard ways of thinking about logical grounds. An alternative to the standard picture of logical grounds is introduced which resolves the puzzle and has much else to recommend it in terms of its scope and uniformity. Sections 1 and 2 set out the puzzle, Sections 3–6 set out my preferred solution, and Section 7 concludes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Bevan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: