Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis using Monte Carlo simulations shows optimal allocation of error sources reduces UAV positioning error significantly.
To address the issues of insufficient accuracy due to nonlinear error accumulation in traditional drone angle-of-arrival (AOA) positioning and the tendency of existing optimization algorithms to get stuck in local optima, this paper proposes a positioning error optimization method that integrates phased correction with an improved Starling optimization algorithm. By constructing a multi-source error propagation model, we analyze the error propagation characteristics of UAV position, attitude, and pod attitude. A phased optimization framework based on observation sequences is designed to suppress the nonlinear accumulation of errors. Subsequently, by integrating the improved Starling optimization algorithm with cubic chaotic mapping and a spiral search strategy, optimal allocation and compensation of error sources are achieved. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the improved algorithm achieves a 73.29% reduction in positioning error distance compared to AOA positioning accuracy and a 58.12% improvement over the original Starling optimization algorithm. It significantly outperforms other comparison algorithms, proving this method effectively corrects nonlinear perturbations in electro-optical systems and provides a higher-precision solution for passive positioning of UAVs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: