Analysis reveals entire solutions in complex nonlinear partial differential equations, highlighting crucial roles of nevanlinna theory and meromorphic functions.
This article focuses on describing the entire solutions of complex nonlinear partial differential equation (systems) with two variables. Utilizing Nevanlinna theory along with the Hadamard factorization theory of meromorphic functions, we derive several results that characterize the existence and forms of finite order transcendental entire solutions for first order nonlinear partial differential equations <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block" overflow="scroll"> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mfenced close=")" open="("> <m:mrow> <m:mi>a</m:mi> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>z</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>b</m:mi> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>z</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:mfenced> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>m</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mfenced close=")" open="("> <m:mrow> <m:mi>c</m:mi> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>z</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>d</m:mi> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>z</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:mfenced> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>,</m:mo> </m:math> (af_z₁+bf_z₂)ᵐ(cf_z₁+df_z₂)ⁿ=1, and the systems of the partial differential equations <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block" overflow="scroll"> <m:mfenced close="" open="{"> <m:mrow> <m:mtable class="aligned"> <m:mtr> <m:mtd columnalign="right"> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mfenced close=")" open="("> <m:mrow> <m:mi>a</m:mi> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>z</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>b</m:mi> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>z</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:mfenced> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>m</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mfenced close=")" open="("> <m:mrow> <m:mi>c</m:mi> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>g</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>z</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>d</m:mi> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>g</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu Bin Chen (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: