Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study shows echocardiographic parameters predict ventricular arrhythmia risk in AICD patients, indicating need for better risk stratification.
(1) Background: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease. While automated implantable cardioverter–defibrillators (AICDs) are standard treatment for high-risk patients, predicting future VA post-implantation remains limited. This study evaluated echocardiographic and strain parameters for predicting VA risk in AICD recipients. (2) Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent AICD implantation at Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia (January 2014–May 2024). Pre-implant transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) were analysed for structural and functional parameters, including left-ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF), LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), mechanical dispersion (MD), and delta contraction duration (DCD). VA events, defined as appropriate AICD shock or anti-tachycardia pacing, were identified from electronic medical records and device checks. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. (3) Results: Among 242 patients, 98 experienced VA events. Increased LV end-diastolic diameter, indexed LV mass, and right-ventricular basal diameter were associated with VA events (p < 0.05), whilst LVEF and GLS were not. LV dyssynchrony was greater in affected patients (MD 69.2 ms vs. 63 ms, p = 0.036; DCD 288.8 ms vs. 246.4 ms, p = 0.010). DCD was an independent predictor of VA events (HR 1.003; 95% CI: 1.000–1.006; p = 0.022). (4) Conclusions: DCD may improve risk stratification in AICD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harapoz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: