Key result
Preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter ≥72 mm in ICM patients and right ventricular diameter ≥46 mm in NICM patients predicted ventricular arrhythmias post-LVAD.
Why the study?
The predictive value of preoperative echocardiographic parameters for the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with preexisting ICD undergoing LVAD implantation needed evaluation.
Do preoperative echocardiographic parameters predict the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with preexisting ICD undergoing LVAD implantation?
Cohort (n=264)
No
Do preoperative echocardiographic parameters predict the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with preexisting ICD undergoing LVAD implantation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Larger preoperative left and right ventricular diameters on echocardiography predict the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in the first year after LVAD implantation.
AIM: To evaluate the predictive value of preoperative echocardiographic parameters for occurrence of VAs in patients with preexisting ICD undergoing LVAD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive patients (n = 264) with previous ICD who underwent LVAD surgery between May 2011 and December 2019 at our institution were included. The patients were predominantly male (89%) with NICM (59%) and a mean age of 59 ± 10 years. All LVADs were continuous flow device (154 HVAD, 21 HeartMate II, and 89 HeartMate 3). A total of 102 (39%) patients had VAs in the first year after LVAD implantation. We compared echocardiographic parameters in patients with and without VAs before LVAD, at 1 month and 1 year after LVAD implantation. Increased pre-LVEDD ≥ 72 mm predicted the occurrence of VAs after LVAD implantation for ICM patients (HR: 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): [1.3-6.6], p = 0.012), while a larger pre-RVEDD ≥ 46 mm was predictive in NICM patients (HR: 2.8, (CI): [1.4-5.9], p = 0.004). Moreover, a larger RVEDD at 1 year after LVAD was highly associated with VAs in the first year after LVAD implantation (50 ± 10 vs. 45 ± 8 mm, p = 0.001). All patients demonstrated a significant decrease in LVEDD as well as a reduction in severity of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation during 1 year after LVAD implantation, reflecting left ventricular unloading through the LVAD. CONCLUSIONS: Larger left and right ventricular diameters before LVAD predict the occurrence of VAs after LVAD implantation in ICM and NICM patients. Persistent RV remodeling post-LVAD is also associated with VAs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Efimova et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Patients with preexisting ICD undergoing LVAD implantation (n=264). Preoperative echocardiographic parameters (LVEDD and RVEDD) vs. Patients without increased ventricular diameters was evaluated on Occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in the first year after LVAD implantation (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.6, p=0.012). Preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter ≥72 mm in ICM patients and right ventricular diameter ≥46 mm in NICM patients predicted ventricular arrhythmias post-LVAD.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: