Key result
CF-LVAD implantation increased clinically significant arrhythmias, with preimplant ventricular arrhythmias strongly predicting postoperative events (OR 4.31; 95% CI 1.5-12.3; p<0.01).
Why the study?
Does CF-LVAD implantation increase the incidence of arrhythmias and shocks in patients with a pre-existing CIED compared to other cardiac surgeries?
Cohort (n=216)
Does CF-LVAD implantation increase the incidence of arrhythmias and shocks in patients with a pre-existing CIED compared to other cardiac surgeries?
CF-LVAD implantation in patients with pre-existing CIEDs is associated with a transient increase in clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias and shocks, which do not appear to impact overall survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant closer perioperative VA monitoring in CF-LVAD recipients with prior arrhythmias; leaves open prospective ICD strategy trials.
Utilization of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) for advanced heart failure is increasing, and the role of cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIED) is unclear. Prior studies of the incidence of arrhythmias and shocks are frequently limited by ascertainment. One hundred and seventy-eight patients were examined with a previous CIED who were implanted with a CF-LVAD. Medical history, medications, and CIED data from device interrogations were gathered. A cardiac surgery control group (n = 38) was obtained to control for surgical factors. Several clinically significant events increased after LVAD implantation: treated-zone ventricular arrhythmias (VA; p < 0.01), monitored-zone VA (p < 0.01), antitachycardia pacing (ATP)-terminated episodes (p < 0.01), and shocks (p = 0.01), although administered shocks later decreased (p < 0.01). Presence of a preimplant VA was associated with postoperative VA (odds ratio [OR]: 4.31; confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-12.3, p < 0.01). Relative to cardiac surgery, LVAD patients experienced more perioperative events (i.e., monitored VAs and shocks, p < 0.01 and p = 0.04). Neither implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks before implant nor early or late postimplant arrhythmias or shocks predicted survival (p = 0.07, p = 0.55, and p = 0.55). Our experience demonstrates time-dependent effects on clinically significant arrhythmias after LVAD implantation, including evidence that early LVAD-related arrhythmias may be caused by the unique arrhythmogenic effects of VAD implant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosenbaum et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Advanced heart failure (n=216). Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation vs. Cardiac surgery control group was evaluated on Postoperative ventricular arrhythmias (OR 4.31, 95% CI 1.5-12.3, p=<0.01). CF-LVAD implantation increased clinically significant arrhythmias, with preimplant ventricular arrhythmias strongly predicting postoperative events (OR 4.31; 95% CI 1.5-12.3; p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: