Key result
Integrating GDMT and interventional therapies may enhance QoL and outcomes in HF and VHD.
Why the study?
Traditional step-by-step management prioritizes GDMT before interventions in coexisting HF and VHD, but greater percutaneous experience could support a more integrated approach.
This expert opinion paper advocates for an integrated, rather than sequential, approach to medical and interventional therapies in patients with coexisting heart failure and valvular heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports exploring integrated strategies in HF with valvular disease; leaves open confirmation in prospective trials.
Heart failure (HF) and valvular heart disease (VHD) often coexist and share complex pathophysiological pathways. Traditional management strategies follow a step-by-step approach, prioritizing guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and reserving interventional (surgical or percutaneous) options only in case of persistent symptoms or worsening HF after GDMT. However, greater experience with the use of percutaneous procedures, even in high-risk patients, could support a more integrated approach, which exploits the synergistic effects of medical and interventional therapies to increase the tolerability of one vs the other, thereby improving quality of life and outcomes through their synergic effects. This expert opinion paper summarizes current data and evolving practices in the management of VHD in patients with HF, including secondary mitral regurgitation, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and tricuspid regurgitation.
Pagnesi et al. (2026) studied this question. An integrated approach combining medical and interventional therapies may enhance quality of life and outcomes in patients with heart failure and valvular heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: