Key result
The 25-mm valve after annular enlargement and implantation at 12° tilted position achieved the best hemodynamic performance with a 23% and 7% reduction of WSS and SS compared to the 23-mm valve.
Why the study?
To evaluate the hemodynamic effect of tilting after bioprosthetic heart valve implantation in an enlarged aortic annulus, defining the cost of excessive enlargement and identifying optimal prosthesis size and angle.
Does slight oversizing and tilting after annular enlargement improve hemodynamic parameters in bioprosthetic heart valves?
Does slight oversizing and tilting after annular enlargement improve hemodynamic parameters in bioprosthetic heart valves?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.1595% vs 0.1491%
Computational fluid dynamics simulation suggests that slight oversizing and tilting (25-mm valve at 12° tilt) after annular enlargement yields better hemodynamic performance than a smaller aligned valve.
Caution against changing valve sizing practices; leaves open whether simulated shear reductions lower clinical thrombosis risk.
Purpose This study aims to evaluate the hemodynamic effect of tilting after implantation of a bioprosthetic heart valve in an enlarged aortic annulus using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The objective is to define the cost of excessive enlargement in transprosthetical flow and identify the optimal prosthesis size and implantation angle to reduce thrombosis and early degeneration. Methods Virtual implantation of a 23-mm bioprosthetic model was conducted in a prespecified virtual aortic annulus of 23 mm. CFD simulations were conducted to analyze the hemodynamic parameters, including wall shear stress and turbulent kinetic energy, for bioprosthetic heart valves of the 23 mm (perpendicular implantation), 25 mm, and 27 mm (tilted implantation at different angles) after virtual annular enlargement. The simulations utilized transient flow models and mesh convergence studies, to ensure numerical accuracy and clinical relevance. Results The 23-mm valve implanted without annular enlargement and in an aligned fashion to the annulus exhibited higher wall shear stress (WSS) and shear stress (SS) values than the 25-mm valve implanted at 12° tilted position and better hemodynamics than the 27-mm valve at 25° tilted position. The 25-mm valve after annular enlargement and implantation at 12° tilted position achieved the best hemodynamic performance together with a 23% and 7% reduction of WSS and SS as compared to the 23-mm valve. Conclusions Slight oversizing and tilting after annular enlargement yields the best performance of an aortic bioprosthetic valve with lowest WSS and balanced turbulence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berger et al. (2026) studied valvular heart disease. Medtronic Avalus heart valve was evaluated on Wall shear stress (WSS) and shear stress (SS) values after implantation of bioprosthetic heart valves of varying sizes. The 25-mm valve after annular enlargement and implantation at 12° tilted position achieved the best hemodynamic performance with a 23% and 7% reduction of WSS and SS compared to the 23-mm valve.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: