Key result
SGLT2i treatment reduced all-cause mortality by 47% compared to no treatment in HFrEF patients at a follow-up of 12 months.
Why the study?
Despite strong randomized-controlled trial evidence supporting SGLT2 inhibitors in HFrEF, data on patient outcomes in relation to SGLT2 inhibitor treatment in a real-world environment were lacking.
Does SGLT2i treatment reduce all-cause mortality in hospitalized patients with HFrEF?
Observational (n=810)
Yes
Does SGLT2i treatment reduce all-cause mortality in hospitalized patients with HFrEF?
Effect estimate: HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.33–0.88)
Absolute Event Rate: 11% vs 20%
p-value: p=0.012
In a real-world registry of hospitalized HFrEF patients, continuous treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors during follow-up was independently associated with a significant reduction in 12-month all-cause mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May support SGLT2i in hospitalized HFrEF; extends RCT data to real-world settings but remains hypothesis-generating.
Background Heart failure (HF), including heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), remains a major public health issue with increasing disease burden. Recent advances, particularly data on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), have shifted HFrEF treatment paradigms based on strong evidence from randomised-controlled trials (RCTs). There is a lack of data reflecting HFrEF patient outcomes in relation to SGLT2i treatment in a real-world environment. Methods The ongoing H 2 -registry, initiated in 2021, collects real-world data on hospitalised HF patients in Germany. We analysed HFrEF patients (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF ≤ 40%) enrolled until 30–11-2024, stratified by SGLT2i treatment status at index hospital discharge and during follow-up (FU). We assessed baseline characteristics, predictors of SGLT2i use, and 12-month outcomes. Results Of 810 HFrEF patients (513 SGLT2i, 297 no-SGLT2i), the median age was 70 years, and 23% were female. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Median LVEF was 30%, and 39% had type 2 diabetes. Use of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) was more common in the SGLT2i group. Patients treated with SGLT2i at baseline had significantly lower all-cause mortality during FU in unadjusted time-to-event analyses (HR [95% CI] 0.53 [0.33–0.88]; p = 0.012). However, in multivariate analyses, only MRA treatment was independently associated with reduced mortality risk during FU (HR [95% CI] 0.41 [0.23–0.74]; p = 0.003). In a sub-cohort of patients being continuously treated with an SGLT2i during FU, the observed effect of SGLT2i was more pronounced (unadjusted HR [95% CI] 0.46 [0.28–0.77], p = 0.0023), and continuous SGLT2i treatment was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality in multivariate analyses (adjusted HR [95% CI] 0.54 [0.30–0.99], p = 0.046). Conclusion In this prospective German HF registry, SGLT2i treatment was significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients only with continuous use during FU. Treatment with MRA was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality in all performed analyses. These findings add to the available body of evidence regarding the real-world effectiveness of SGLT2i in HFrEF. Trial registration NCT04844944.
Leiner et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=810). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) vs. No-SGLT2i was evaluated on All-cause mortality over a period of 12 months (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33–0.88, p=0.012). SGLT2i treatment reduced all-cause mortality by 47% compared to no treatment in HFrEF patients at a follow-up of 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: