Key result
Six complex PCI criteria linked to ~86% higher MI risk without altering ST or mortality.
Why the study?
It remained unclear whether ischemic risk in patients undergoing complex PCI is influenced by the full or partial use of the six conventional criteria.
Does the number of conventional criteria used to define complex PCI predict the risk of ischemic outcomes in patients undergoing PCI?
Meta-Analysis (n=52,941)
Does the number of conventional criteria used to define complex PCI predict the risk of ischemic outcomes in patients undergoing PCI?
Effect estimate: RR 1.24 to 1.86
p-value: p=0.01
The risk of myocardial infarction following complex PCI increases proportionally with the number of conventional complexity criteria met, highlighting a graded ischemic risk.
Supports criterion-count stratification for MI risk in complex PCI; reinforces graded ischemic outcomes in DAPT trials.
Background Patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at increased risk of ischemic events independent of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration. It remains unclear whether the ischemic risk is influenced by the full or partial use of the six conventional criteria for defining complex PCI. Purpose To perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials to investigate the risk of ischemic outcomes associated with the number of conventional criteria used to define complex PCI. Methods We searched for randomized trials comparing DAPT duration regimens in patients undergoing complex or non-complex PCI. Conventional criteria included treatment of three vessels, ≥3 lesions treated, ≥3 stents implanted, bifurcation treated with 2 stents, total stent length >60 mm, or chronic total occlusion (CTO) as target lesion. A conventional definition of complex PCI was considered when all six criteria were applied, whereas a non-conventional definition was defined as any classification that included more, fewer, or none of these criteria, deviating from the conventional one. The main outcomes of interest, myocardial infarction (MI), definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), and all-cause mortality, were analyzed as per number of conventional criteria and according to whether a conventional or non-conventional definition was applied. Results Eight studies with a total of 52,941 patients undergoing complex (n= 14,780) or non-complex PCI (n= 38,161) were included. The risk of MI increased proportionally to the number of conventional complex PCI criteria used in the trials with a risk ratio [RR] varying from 1.24 (1 criterion) to 1.86 (6 criteria) with a p for subgroups differences of 0.01, whilst the risk of ST and all-cause death did not. No differences in ischemic outcomes were observed when using conventional versus non-conventional definitions of complex PCI. Conclusions In patients undergoing complex PCI treated with different durations of DAPT, regardless of whether a conventional or non-conventional definition is used, the use of more than one of the conventional criteria to define complex PCI is associated with a higher risk of MI, but not of ST and all-cause death.Myocardial Infarction acc to criteria n.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simonetti et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=52,941). Number of conventional criteria used to define complex PCI vs. Fewer criteria or non-complex PCI was evaluated on Myocardial infarction (MI) (RR 1.24 to 1.86, p=0.01). The risk of myocardial infarction increased proportionally to the number of conventional complex PCI criteria used, with a risk ratio varying from 1.24 for 1 criterion to 1.86 for 6 criteria (P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: