Key result
Complex PCI carries ~71% higher MI risk and increased major bleeding vs. non-complex PCI.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the impact of complex PCI on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization.
Does complex PCI increase the risk of myocardial infarction and major bleeding in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization compared to non-complex PCI?
Does complex PCI increase the risk of myocardial infarction and major bleeding in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization compared to non-complex PCI?
Complex PCI is associated with a significantly higher dual-hazard risk of both ischemic and bleeding events compared to non-complex PCI.
Warrants balanced antithrombotic strategies in complex PCI; confirms dual ischemic-bleeding hazard versus non-complex intervention.
Objective To evaluate the impact of complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Design and data sources: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Embase, MEDLINE and PUBMED-not-medline databases from inception through December 2024. Study selection: We included all studies investigating the prognostic role of complex PCI in patients undergoing PCI. Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The primary analysis was conducted using a random-effects model within a Bayesian framework. All principal analyses were based on adjusted risk estimates, with hazard ratios (adjusted-HR). Secondary analysis included, separately, studies providing unadjusted risk estimates. Outcomes of interest: The primary outcomes of interest were myocardial infarction and major bleeding. Additional outcomes included all-cause death, cardiovascular death, stent thrombosis, target-vessel (or target-lesion) revascularization, and stroke. Results A total of 290,039 participants, of whom 94,633 (33%) met complex-PCI criteria, was included. Patients undergoing complex vs. non-complex PCI had an increased risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted-HR 1.71, 95%CrI 1.49 to 1.96) and major bleeding (adjusted-HR 1.24, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.35). Compared with patients undergoing non-complex PCI, those treated with complex PCI had an increased risk of all-cause death (adjusted-HR 1.21, 95%CrI 1.12 to 1.32), stent thrombosis (adjusted-HR 1.71, 95%CrI 1.45 to 2.04), cardiovascular death (adjusted-HR 1.29, 95%CrI 1.15 to 1.46), target-vessel (or target-lesion) revascularization (adjusted-HR 1.99, 95%CrI 1.58 to 2.49) and stroke (adjusted-HR 1.21, 95%CrI 1.03 to 1.42). The posterior probability that complex PCI was associated with a higher risk than non-complex PCI exceeded 99% for all outcomes. These findings were consistent across studies that reporting unadjusted risk estimates. Conclusions Patients undergoing PCI have a dual-hazard risk of ischemic and bleeding events compared with patients undergoing non-complex PCI.Resume outcomesFor image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vitale et al. (2026) studied this question. Complex percutaneous coronary intervention significantly increased the risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted-HR 1.71) and major bleeding (adjusted-HR 1.24) compared to non-complex PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: