Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This investigation demonstrates effective antibiotic delivery in a 3D bioprinted model, highlighting new treatment possibilities for infections.
Introduction Bacterial antibiotic resistance has emerged as a significant global threat, making it increasingly challenging to effectively treat infections in patients. Nanomedicine technologies can be implemented for the targeted delivery of medications and drugs to patients. This work investigates the use of silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) loaded with the clindamycin and tetracycline antibiotics to treat Staphylococcus epidermidis infection in a 3D-bioprinted dermal model. SiNPs are stable, biocompatible, and can be loaded with small molecules like antibiotics. Methods The SiNPs were synthesized and loaded with antibiotics. The loading efficiency of the SiNPs was determined by UV-Vis spectroscopy and high-performance liquid chromatography. Dome-shaped constructs containing fibroblasts were 3D printed using a fibrin-based bioink to mimic the dermis of skin. These constructs were then inoculated with bacterial cultures labeled with green fluorescent protein (GFP) 4 days post printing and then treated with antibiotic-loaded SiNPs to determine their effect on bacterial growth. After the incubation phase, the bacteria were cultured in broth to determine the colony-forming unit (CFU) count on toxin superantigen (TSA) plates containing 10 mg/mL chloramphenicol. Results and Discussion The CFU count of the 3D-bioprinted human constructs samples treated with antibiotics was significantly lower than both the SiNP-treated and untreated samples. The results suggest that antibioticreleasing SiNPs can serve as a more efficient treatment for skin bacterial infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrade et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: