Meta-analysis shows RSVpreF vaccines significantly reduce hospitalisation and emergency visits in older adults, implying strong vaccine effectiveness.
Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines were first recommended for older adults during the 2023-24 season in countries that authorised their use. Although early observational studies complemented trial findings, real-world evidence on vaccine effectiveness against severe RSV disease remains limited. We assessed the effectiveness of RSVpreF and RSVpreF3 vaccines in preventing RSV-related hospitalisations and emergency department (ED) visits among older adults. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Global Health, and medRxiv for observational studies published between January 1, 2023 and December 30, 2025, reporting real-world effectiveness of RSV vaccines in adults aged 60 years or older. Pooled analyses used inverse-variance random-effects models to estimate effectiveness against RSV-related hospitalisations and ED visits. Subgroup analyses assessed differences in effectiveness by age, immune status, and vaccine type. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251021777). Results From 4925 records screened, 8 cohort and case-control studies were included. Vaccination was associated with lower odds of RSV-related hospitalisation (odds ratio [OR]: 0.23; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.20–0.27; I²=6.5%) and ED visits (OR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.21–0.27; I²=0.0%). Effectiveness against RSV-related hospitalisation was lower in immunocompromised adults (OR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.27–0.34; I²=0.0%) than in immunocompetent individuals (OR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.11–0.35; I²=0.0%). Effectiveness did not differ by age group (60–74 vs ≥75 years) or vaccine product. Conclusions Vaccination provided substantial protection against RSV-related healthcare utilisation among older adults. Continued surveillance and real-world evidence are needed to inform immunisation policy and improve protection in immunocompromised individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sumsuzzman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: