Why the study?
Does performing PCI after TAVI improve 2-year clinical outcomes compared with other revascularisation timing strategies in patients with severe aortic stenosis and stable coronary artery disease scheduled for TAVI?
Does performing PCI after TAVI improve 2-year clinical outcomes compared with other revascularisation timing strategies in patients with severe aortic stenosis and stable coronary artery disease scheduled for TAVI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Performing PCI after TAVI may be associated with better 2-year clinical outcomes compared to other timing strategies, though randomized trials are needed to confirm this finding.
In patients with severe aortic stenosis and stable coronary artery disease scheduled for TAVI, performance of PCI after TAVI seems to be associated with improved 2-year clinical outcomes compared with other revascularisation timing strategies. These results need to be confirmed in randomised clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rheude et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: