PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 2026Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions0 citations

Predicting Coronary Occlusion Risk during Redo‐TAVR at First TAVR: Asymmetric Calcification Causes Failure

View Full Paper
KOKyohei OnishiMYM YasudaNYN Yamada

Key Result

Asymmetric non-coronary cusp calcification ≥41.6% independently predicted high sinus sequestration risk during redo-TAVR with OR 12.59 (p < 0.001).

Key Points

  • The study investigates the accuracy of predicting coronary artery occlusion risk using pre-procedural CT in redo TAVR cases.
  • Retrospective evaluation of 139 patients who underwent TAVR with a balloon-expandable valve.
  • Measurement of predicted VTSTJ length and calcium volume on pre-procedural CT.
  • Comparison of predicted SS risk to actual SS risk observed on post-procedural CT.
  • High SS risk was accurately predicted in 78 patients, with 98.7% confirming high observed SS risk post-procedure.
  • 72.1% of patients classified as low PSS risk had high OSS risk post-TAVR.
  • NCC-CV ≥ 41.6% was identified as an independent predictor of high OSS risk with strong statistical significance.

Structured PICO

Does pre-procedural CT accurately predict sinus sequestration risk during redo-TAVR in patients undergoing initial TAVR?

P
Population
139 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a balloon-expandable valve.
I
Intervention
Pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) assessment of predicted valve-to-sinotubular junction (VTSTJ) length and calcium volume of each coronary cusp.
C
Comparator
Post-procedural CT assessment of observed VTSTJ length (high risk defined as < 2.0 mm in either right or left coronary cusp).
O
Outcome
Accuracy of sinus sequestration (SS) risk prediction (high observed SS risk on post-procedural CT).surrogate

Asymmetric non-coronary cusp calcification (≥ 41.6%) significantly predicts discrepancies in pre-procedural CT estimates of sinus sequestration risk for future redo-TAVR.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Predicting coronary artery occlusion due to sinus sequestration (SS) during a second transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) procedure using pre‐procedural computed tomography (CT) after the first TAV replacement (TAVR) is underreported. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of SS risk prediction using pre‐procedural CT by comparing it to the actual SS risk observed on post‐procedural CT during TAV‐in‐TAV. Methods and Results We retrospectively evaluated 139 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR with a balloon‐expandable valve. The predicted valve‐to‐sinotubular junction (VTSTJ) length and calcium volume of each coronary cusp were measured on pre‐procedural CT. The observed VTSTJ length was assessed on post‐procedural CT. High SS risk was defined as VTSTJ < 2.0 mm in either the right or left coronary cusp. Pre‐procedural CT classified 78 patients into the high predicted SS (PSS) risk group; 77 (98.7%) showed a high observed SS (OSS) risk on post‐procedural CT. Among the 61 patients classified as having low PSS risk, 44 (72.1%) were found to have high OSS risk post‐TAVR. In this subgroup, patients with high OSS risk had a significantly higher proportion of non‐coronary cusp calcium volume (NCC‐CV) compared to those with low OSS risk (median 48.7% interquartile range (IQR): 42.1–55.2 vs. 39.2% IQR: 33.7–45.4; p = 0.004). Multivariable logistic regression revealed NCC‐CV ≥ 41.6% as an independent predictor of high OSS risk during TAV‐in‐TAV (odds ratio: 12.59 95% confidence interval: 4.20–44.14, p < 0.001). Conclusion Asymmetric NCC calcification was associated with discrepancies in SS predictions on pre‐procedural CT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Onishi et al. (2026) studied this question. Asymmetric non-coronary cusp calcification ≥41.6% independently predicted high sinus sequestration risk during redo-TAVR with OR 12.59 (p < 0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d3fc8de8e28729cf64871https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70498
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery2010 · 7,226 citations
  2. 2Predictors of calcification distribution in severe tricuspid aortic valve stenosis2021 · 9 citations
  3. 3Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients at Five Years2023 · 620 citations
  4. 4Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients2016 · 5,090 citations
  5. 5Calcium distribution patterns of the aortic valve as a risk factor for the need of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation2016 · 173 citations