Key result
Novel ERAS-based cardiac rehabilitation training reduced adverse cardiac events to 6.52% compared to 23.91% with routine rehab in AMI patients post-PCI after 3 months.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the effect of novel cardiac rehabilitation training based on enhanced recovery after surgery on cardiac function in patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI.
Does novel cardiac rehabilitation training based on ERAS improve cardiac function and exercise endurance in patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI?
RCT (n=92)
Random number table method
No
Does novel cardiac rehabilitation training based on ERAS improve cardiac function and exercise endurance in patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI?
ERAS-based cardiac rehabilitation significantly improves cardiac function, exercise capacity, and reduces adverse events in AMI patients post-PCI.
Warrants broader ERAS-based rehab post-PCI for AMI; extends prior CR trials with superior function, endurance, and outcomes.[[1]](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12728029/)[[2]](https://www.sciencedirect.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of novel cardiac rehabilitation training on cardiac function in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) based on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).MethodsA total of 92 AMI patients admitted to the cardiology department of Dongying District People's Hospital from May 2020 to May 2023 were selected and randomly divided into control group and experimental group using a random number table method, with 46 patients in each group. Both groups received standardized symptomatic treatment and PCI surgery after admission. The control group received routine cardiac rehabilitation training in addition to the standardized treatment. On the basis of standardized treatment and routine cardiac rehabilitation training, the experimental group was given a new type of cardiac rehabilitation training based on ERAS. Peak power (PP), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured using a color echocardiography diagnostic instrument before training, after one month of training, and after three months of training; Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing were used to assess exercise endurance, including exercise duration (ED), peak oxygen uptake (VO₂), and anaerobic threshold (AT); N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was measured using the Roche Cobas e411 chemiluminescence analyzer; superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was measured using the xanthine oxidase method; malondialdehyde (MDA) expression level was measured using the thiobarbituric acid colorimetric method; total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) was measured using the phenanthrene colorimetric method; expression levels of interleukin-18 (IL-18), nucleotide-binding oligomerization NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3), and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and expression level of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) was measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Cardiopulmonary function was evaluated with the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS) was used to evaluate the patients' quality of life.ResultsCompared with those before training, PP and LVEF increased in both groups after one month and three months of training (P<0.05), while LVESD and NT-proBNP expression levels decreased (P<0.05); compared with those after one month of training, PP and LVEF increased in both groups after three months of training (P<0.05), while LVESD and NT-proBNP expression levels decreased (P<0.05); compared with those in the control group at the same time, the experimental group showed an increase in PP and LVEF after one month and three months of training (P<0.05), while the expression levels of LVESD and NT-proBNP decreased (P<0.05). Compared with those before training, both groups showed an increase in VO₂ peak and AT values after 1 month and 3 months of training (P<0.05), and an extension of ED (P<0.05); compared with one month after training, both groups showed an increase in VO₂ peak and AT values (P<0.05) and a prolongation of ED (P<0.05) after three months of training; compared with those in the control group at the same time, the experimental group showed an increase in VO₂ peak and AT value after one month and three months of training (P<0.05), and an extension of ED (P<0.05). Compared with before training, SOD activity and T-AOC increased (P<0.05) and MDA expression level decreased (P<0.05) in both groups after one month and three months of training; compared with one month after training, both groups showed an increase in SOD activity and T-AOC after three months of training (P<0.05), while MDA expression level decreased (P<0.05); compared with those in the control group at the same time, the experimental group showed an increase in SOD activity and T-AOC (P<0.05) and a decrease in MDA expression level (P<0.05) after one month and three months of training. Compared with before those training, the expression levels of IL-18, IL-1β, NF-κB, and NLRP3 decreased in both groups after one month and three months of training (P<0.05); compared with one month after training, the expression levels of IL-18, IL-1β, NF-κB, and NLRP3 decreased in both groups after three months of training (P<0.05); compared with those in control group at the same time, the expression levels of IL-18, IL-1β, NF-κB, and NLRP3 decreased in the experimental group after one month and three months of training. Compared with before those training, both groups showed an increase in 6MWT after one month and three months of training (P<0.05), and a decrease in MIDAS score (P<0.05); compared with one month after training, both groups showed an increase in 6MWT (P<0.05) and a decrease in MIDAS score (P<0.05) after three months of training; compared with those in the control group at the same time, the experimental group showed an increase in 6MWT and a decrease in MIDAS score after one and three months of training (P<0.05).ConclusionThe novel ERAS-based cardiac rehabilitation training can regulate heart failure markers, antioxidant capacity, and inflammation levels in AMI patients after PCI, which helps improve cardiac function, enhance exercise endurance, and reduce the risk of adverse cardiac events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
CHENG et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with Killip class I-II heart function, admitted within 10 hours of onset (n=92). Novel cardiac rehabilitation training based on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) vs. Routine cardiac rehabilitation training plus standardized treatment was evaluated on Composite cardiac function and exercise endurance parameters and incidence of adverse cardiac events during 3 months of training (P < 0.05 for difference in adverse cardiac event rates (experimental group 6.52% vs control 23.91%), p=<0.05). Novel ERAS-based cardiac rehabilitation training reduced adverse cardiac events to 6.52% compared to 23.91% with routine rehab in AMI patients post-PCI after 3 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: