Why the study?
CA-125 is elevated and associated with severity in heart failure and COPD, and PAH patients may also die from right heart failure, but its prognostic role in PAH was unknown.
Does elevated serum CA-125 predict mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Does elevated serum CA-125 predict mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Serum CA-125 levels > 35.32 U/ml on admission serve as an independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Background: Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA 125), known as a tumor marker for ovarian cancer, has been reported to increase and be associated with severity in heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension may also die due to developing right heart failure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic role of CA-125 in PAH patients. Methods: A total of 40 consecutive patients with PAH were evaluated prospectively. The mean age of patients was 52 +/- 11 years (12% males, 88% females) with a median follow-up period of 16 months. Results: After follow-up period, 12 out of 40 patients (30%) died. CA-125 levels were higher among those who died compared to those who survived [78.5 (11.0-292) vs. 27.5 (2.10-138) U/ml, p = 0.001]. The optimal cut-off value of CA-125 to predict mortality was found as 35.29 U/ml, with 85.7% specificity and 75% sensitivity. In multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model with forward stepwise method; CA-125 > 35.32 U/ml on admission (HR = 7.645, 95% CI: 1.356-43.121, p = 0.021), age (HR = 1.132, 95% CI: 1.040-1.233, p = 0.004), TAPSE (HR = 0.740, 95% CI: 0.549-0.998, p = 0.048) and uric acid (HR = 1.444, 95% CI: 1.022-2.042, p = 0.037) remained associated with an increased risk of death. Conclusion: In this study, we showed for the first time that serum CA-125 values were an independent predictor for the long-term mortality in PAH patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ŞAHİN et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: