Key result
Lactate-minimum running velocity fails to achieve blood lactate steady state in trained middle-distance runners.
Why the study?
Does the running velocity derived from the lactate-minimum approach elicit a lactate steady state in male trained middle-distance runners?
Does the running velocity derived from the lactate-minimum approach elicit a lactate steady state in male trained middle-distance runners?
The lactate-minimum approach does not reliably elicit a lactate steady state in highly trained male middle-distance runners, highlighting the need for direct MLSS verification.
Caution against lactate-minimum velocity for steady-state training in runners; challenges consensus on its reliability and requires direct MLSS verification.
Despite stable cardiorespiratory and substrate-utilization profiles, the significant variability in blood lactate concentration during the 30-minute constant-load run indicates that the running velocity derived from the lactate-minimum approach did not elicit a lactate steady state in this trained cohort. These findings suggest that physiological responses at the MLaSS-derived intensity may differ from classical steady-state expectations in highly trained endurance runners and highlight the need for direct MLSS verification in future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seyed Houtan Shahidi (2026) studied this question. Running velocity from lactate-minimum method did not achieve lactate steady state in trained middle-distance runners, showing variability in blood lactate during a 30-min run.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: