Key result
Neuromuscular blockade with TOF ≤ 3 improves pentaspline catheter stability during right-sided PFA.
Why the study?
Does neuromuscular blockade (curarization) improve catheter stability in patients undergoing pulsed-field pulmonary vein ablation?
Cohort (n=76)
Yes
Does neuromuscular blockade (curarization) improve catheter stability in patients undergoing pulsed-field pulmonary vein ablation?
Maintaining adequate neuromuscular blockade (TOF ≤ 3) during right-sided pulsed-field ablation significantly improves catheter stability and reduces inadvertent venous intubation.
Supports TOF ≤3 blockade during right-sided PFA; hypothesis-generating for enhanced pentaspline procedural safety.
BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is effective for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), but phrenic nerve stimulation during applications may induce diaphragmatic contractions and destabilize catheter positioning. This study evaluated whether neuromuscular blockade improves catheter stability. METHODS: Seventy-six patients undergoing PFA under general anesthesia were prospectively enrolled across three centers. Curarization was assessed using train-of-four (TOF). Catheter motion was measured fluoroscopically, including diaphragmatic excursion, lateral displacement, axial entry into the vein, and inadvertent venous intubation. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (85%) received curare. In right pulmonary veins, catheter and diaphragmatic motion increased progressively with higher TOF. Compared with TOF 0, absence of curare resulted in greater diaphragmatic excursion, increased lateral and axial catheter movement, and more frequent venous intubation (all p < 0.001). Higher TOF (≥ 4) remained an independent predictor of excessive motion. Left-sided veins showed limited motion across TOF levels. CONCLUSION: Inadequate neuromuscular blockade is strongly associated with catheter instability during right-sided PFA. Maintaining TOF ≤ 3 improves stability and may enhance procedural safety. Larger studies are needed to assess long-term impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menet et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing pulsed-field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (n=76). Curarization (neuromuscular blockade) vs. Absence of curare / Train-of-four (TOF) 0 was evaluated on Catheter motion (diaphragmatic excursion, lateral displacement, axial entry into the vein, and inadvertent venous intubation) (p=<0.001). Absence of curare during right-sided pulsed-field ablation resulted in greater diaphragmatic excursion, increased catheter movement, and more frequent venous intubation compared to TOF 0 (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: