PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 21, 2006European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery151 citationsOpen Access

Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients

View Full Paper
AKAlexander KulikPBP BEDARDBLB-Khanh Lam

Key Points

  • To evaluate whether middle-aged patients experience differing rates of adverse events with mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacements.
  • Assessed post-implantation outcomes and complication rates between mechanical and bioprosthetic heart valves in middle-aged cohorts.

Structured PICO

Does mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement affect the incidence of MAPE in middle-aged patients?

P
Population
Middle-aged patients requiring valve replacement
I
Intervention
Mechanical valve replacement
C
Comparator
Bioprosthetic valve replacement
O
Outcome
MAPE

Current data do not support lowering the usual age cutoff for tissue valve implantation below 65 years.

Limitations

  • Requires accumulation of additional follow-up for definitive conclusions

Abstract

In middle-aged patients, MAPE may occur more often in patients with bioprosthetic valves, but definitive conclusions necessitate the accumulation of additional follow-up. At present, these data do not support lowering the usual cutoff for implantation of a tissue valve below the age of 65.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kulik et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c1aeceaa580801bf53b3fahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.06.013
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper