Retrospective review identifies imaging selection factors in Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis, suggesting improved decision-making.
Background/Introduction: Standardized staging imaging for Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) is lacking. This study aims to identify patient and disease factors that influence imaging selection and propose a clinical decision algorithm that supports more deliberate, radiation- and cost-conscious use of imaging. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with biopsy-proven LCH, evaluated at a single institution, was conducted from 2001 to 2025. Age, sex, and presenting location at diagnosis were compared across imaging groups (Positron emission tomography/computed tomography [PET/CT], bone scintigraphy, and skeletal survey). Disease extent (unifocal, multifocal, multisystem) was summarized according to the imaging modality each patient received. Results: The cohort included 78 patients: 30 PET/CT, 11 bone scans, and 37 skeletal surveys. Median age differed significantly by modality: PET/CT 34 years (interquartile range [IQR] 8–56) vs. bone scan 13 years (3–37) vs. skeletal survey 7 years (2–14) (p < 0.001). Imaging selection varied significantly by anatomic location (p = 0.016): bone lesions were assessed with skeletal survey (52.8%), PET/CT (28.3%), and bone scan (18.9%). All pulmonary cases received PET/CT imaging. Six of the 78 patients had multisystem disease, and all six had been staged with PET/CT (Fisher’s exact p = 0.006, PET/CT vs. skeletal survey; Bonferroni-adjusted p = 0.018). Conclusions: In addition to age, the initial presentation site influences the choice of imaging modality. Given the higher radiation burden and cost of PET/CT, further research is needed to determine whether this observed practice pattern translates to improved clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gettleman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: